Page 1 (0s)
KAIZEN ACTIVITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. A close up of a machine Description automatically generated with low confidence.
Page 2 (11s)
BACKGROUND STUDY. 1. During FEP preparation there were no major problem occurred. Engineering had improved the tooling and part condition before PP started..
Page 3 (45s)
KAIZEN TARGET OUTCOMES. To reduce PP part rejection.
Page 4 (1m 3s)
STUDY CASE 1. BG799 (FS-1-WL). FEP qty = 20 sets no major part issue.
Page 5 (2m 25s)
STUDY CASE 2. PC240 (TD-02). FEP qty = 26 sets no major part issue.
Page 6 (3m 49s)
Current practice. DEVELOPMENT FLOW. 0000 PP & MP impmwr•nt.
Page 7 (4m 53s)
PRE-PRODUCTION (PP) PART QUALITY CONTROL. Early -Middle-End part quality check.
Page 8 (5m 45s)
KAIZEN ACTIVITY OUTCOMES. 1) FS-1WL (TOP CASE) for PP.
Page 9 (6m 20s)
KAIZEN ACTIVITY EFFECT TO RMM & SUPPLIER. SUPPLIERS.
Page 10 (7m 17s)
THANK YOU! ありがとうございました！. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLASTIC GROUP.