PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD BY SHAIK SUFIYAN SHEZAN (0845498)

[Audio] PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD BY SHAIK SUFIYAN SHEZAN (0845498) In the long history of humankind, those who learned to collaborate and improvise most effectively have prevailed. – Charles Darwin.

[Audio] CONTENT INTROCDUTION TYPES OF PROJET DELIVERY METHODS DESIGN-BUILD DESIGN-BID-BUILT PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTHERSHIP (P3) INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY CONCLUSION.

[Audio] DIFFERENT TYPES OF DELIVERY METHODS DESIGN BUILD DESIGN BID BUILD PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP INTEGRATED PROJECT.

[Audio] A project delivery method in construction defines how a project is designed, constructed, and managed. It outlines the roles, responsibilities, and relationships among the project participants. INTRODUCTION.

[Audio] EXAMPLES OF DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT: West Park Healthcare Centre Redevelopment: A hospital project in Toronto used the Design-Build approach for efficiency. Highway 407 East Extension: The extension project employed Design-Build to accelerate delivery. Design-Build is a project delivery method where a single entity is responsible for both the design and construction phases of a project. DESIGN-BUILD ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Single Point of Responsibility: Streamlined communication and accountability. Faster Project Delivery: Concurrent design and construction phases reduce overall project duration. Cost Savings: Potential for cost savings due to early collaboration and value engineering. Limited Owner Control: Owners may have less control over the design process. Potential for Conflicts of Interest: The design-builder may prioritize cost-cutting over long-term quality..

[Audio] DESIGN BUILD:. A diagram of a company Description automatically generated.

[Audio] DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) is a traditional project delivery method used in the construction industry. It is a linear and sequential process that consists of three main phases: design, bid, and build. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Competitive Bidding: The bidding process encourages healthy competition among contractors, potentially leading to cost savings for the project owner. Fixed Price: The project owner usually receives a fixed price for the construction work, reducing the risk of cost overruns. Straightforward Process: The linear sequence of phases is easy to understand and follow, making it familiar for many stakeholders. Sequential Nature: The linear nature of the process can lead to a longer project duration compared to more collaborative methods. Limited Flexibility: Changes or modifications to the project during construction may be more challenging to implement and may result in additional costs. Potential for Low-Bid Quality: The lowest bidder may not always deliver the best quality, and there is a risk of contractors cutting corners to reduce costs. Example of design-bid-build project: Toronto City hall Ontario science centre.

[Audio] DESIGN-BID-BUILD. DESIGN-BID-BUILD. A diagram of a company.

[Audio] PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP also known as P3s, involve collaboration between a public-sector authority and a private-sector entity for the design, financing, construction, operation, and maintenance of public infrastructure or services ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Innovation and Efficiency: Private sector involvement often brings innovation and efficiency through the application of advanced technologies and management practices. Risk Transfer: PPPs allow for the transfer of certain project risks (such as construction and operational risks) from the public sector to the private sector. This can incentivize the private partner to manage these risks effectively. Faster Project Delivery: PPPs may result in faster project delivery due to the private sector's ability to streamline processes and adhere to strict timelines to meet financial objectives. Cost and Financing Issues: The financing costs associated with private capital can be higher than government borrowing, potentially leading to increased project costs. Limited Public Control: The transfer of responsibilities to the private sector may reduce the level of direct control that the public sector has over the project, which can be a concern for some stakeholders. Complexity and Transaction Costs: The process of structuring and negotiating a PPP can be complex and resource-intensive, leading to higher transaction costs. Example of Public- Private Partnership project: Bridgepoint Hospital. Halton Region Consolidated centre..

[Audio] PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP OWNER (Eventual) Inspector (independent) Consortium (Financier/Designer/ General) Sub-Trade 1 Contractor Sub-Trade 2 Sub-Sub-Trade Sub-Trade 3.

[Audio] INTEGRATED PROJECT involve collaboration and coordination among various stakeholders, including designers, contractors, and owners, to optimize the overall project delivery process. The goal is to enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and improve project outcomes. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Early Collaboration: Early involvement of key stakeholders fosters collaboration, enabling better decision-making and problem-solving from the outset. Cost Savings: Integrated projects can result in cost savings through improved coordination, reduced rework, and optimized resource allocation. Risk Mitigation: Integrated projects often involve shared risks and rewards, encouraging all parties to work together to mitigate risks and find cost-effective solutions. Complexity: The integrated project delivery approach can be more complex than traditional methods, requiring effective management and communication to navigate complexities successfully. Cultural Shift: Shifting from traditional project delivery models to integrated approaches may require a cultural shift in how stakeholders approach their roles and responsibilities. Contractual Challenges: Creating and managing contracts that align with the integrated approach can be challenging, as traditional contract structures may need to be adapted. Examples of Integrated Projects: Bridgepoint Active Healthcare (Toronto) St. Michael's Hospital Unity Health Toronto Pan Am Games Athletes Village (Toronto 2015).

[Audio] INTEGRATED PROJECT OWNER CONSTRUCTION MANAGER GENERAL CONTRACTOR FINANCIER SUB-CONTRACTOR SUB-CONTRACTOR.

[Audio] RISK AND CONTROL LEVELS PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP DESIGN BUILD INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY DESIGN BID BUILD LEAST OWNER’S RISK GREATEST GREATEST CONTRACTOR’S RISK LEAST LEAST OWNER’S CONTROL GREATEST GREATEST CONTRACTOR’S CONTROL LEAST.

[Audio] SHORT VIDEO ON PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD.. SHORT VIDEO ON PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD..

[Audio] CONCLUSION: The project delivery methods play a crucial role in organizing and executing construction projects. They encompass processes, procedures, and components involved in designing and building facilities. The choice of a project delivery method is a critical decision for project owners, impacting factors such as cost, quality, and overall success. Various approaches, such as design-bid-build, design-build, and integrated project delivery, offer different advantages and considerations. Evaluating the effectiveness of project delivery methods reveals a slower evolution compared to the construction industry itself . Ultimately, the selection of the most appropriate method is key to reducing risk and ensuring project success..

[Audio] THANK YOU. Aerial view of a highway near the ocean.