Angelica Portes-tatlonghari, Shierre Ann Portes-palicpic And Katrina Portes-tan, Complainants, versus Timoteo Batilo, Donato Tungpalan, Margie Nocuenca, Joselito Ragsac, Jesus Batilo, Ronaldo Sanchez, Wilfredo Garcia, Jay Baring And Other John Does, Res

Angelica Portes-tatlonghari , Shierre Ann Portes-palicpic And Katrina Portes -tan, Complainants, versus Timoteo Batilo , Donato Tungpalan , Margie Nocuenca , Joselito Ragsac , Jesus Batilo , Ronaldo Sanchez, Wilfredo Garcia, Jay Baring And Other John Does, Respondents..

Text Description automatically generated. Text, letter Description automatically generated.

Prosecutor’s RuliNG. Wherefore, all the foregoing premises considered, it is most respectfully recommended that the complaint for Murder filed against Respondents TIMOTEO “TOMMY” BATILO, DONATO VENTURA TUNGPALAN, MARGIE N. NOCUENCA a.k.a. “Mamay”, JOSELITO OBCIANA RAGSAC a.k.a. “ Kagawad Tisoy ”, JESUS HALLIA BATILO a.k.a. “ Alyas Baang ”, RONALDO DIAZ SANCHEZ a.k.a. “ Alyas Onad ”, WILFREDO GARCIA a.k.a. “Wing”, JAY OANO BARING alias “Sir Jay”, and other JOHN DOES be dismissed for insufficiency of evidence ..

BINASURA ANG KASO LABAN KAY BATILO DAHIL HINDE SAPAT ANG EBIDENSYA NG KASALULUYANG MAYOR AT nG KANYANG MGA KAPATID.

Basis of ruling. C arefully evaluating the case and applying the foregoing jurisprudential matters, undersigned are of the impression that the sole basis of the complainants in claiming that the Respondents were the one responsible in killing the victim is not sufficient in finding probable cause to charge Respondents of the offense charged. While we deeply sympathize with the Complainants for the death of their beloved father, it must be emphasized, though, that allegations, especially if unsupported, are not tantamount to proof which will engender probable cause to indict Respondents..

ANG BASEHAN NG KASO NA ISINAMPA NG KASALUKUYANG MAYOR AT MGA KAPATID NIYA LABAN KAY TIMOTEO BATILO AY ANG TESTIMONYA LAMANG NG TESTIGO NA SI CARLITO P. RAMISO Ayon sa resolusyon , hinde ito sapat para maihabla si batilo sa kasong murder Ang paratang na walang suportang ebidensya ay hinde sapat para maihabla ang isang tao sa korte.

Bakit po nasabi ng fiscal na insufficient ang testimonya ni Carlito ramiso.

Bakit hinde kapanipaniwala at hinde maaAri mangyari ang sinasabi ng testigo.

Ramiso’s narration of facts regarding the alleged meeting on November 15, 2020 at Sambokojin restaurant in Quezon City does not have evidence to support his claim ( hinde daw yung kapapaniwala dahil walang suportang ebidensiya . Yung panahon na iyon grabe ang pagkalat ng covid-19, bakit hinde nila naattach ang logbook ng restaurant na makapagpapatunay sa binibintang niya ).

“if there was truth in the alleged meeting, and Tungpalan told him not to interfere with what they are talking about. It follows that he need not know of what they are talking about. Again, we go back to the question, what is the purpose of Ramiso being in the meeting?” (SABI PO KASI NG TESTIGO NA ISINAMA SIYA SA MEETING PERO SINABIHAN SIYA NA HUWAG MAKIKIELAM KUNG ANO MAN ANG PAG-UUSAPAN. KUNG GANUN PALA NA HINDE SIYA PWEDENG MAKIELAM, BAKIT PA SIYA ISASAMA IN THE FIRST PLACE KAYA HINDE DAW MAAARI NA NANGYARI YUNG KWENTO NG TESTIGO AYON SA FISCAL).

the investigating prosecutor found it very unusual that a meeting of very sensitive in nature will be held in a restaurant, a PUBLIC PLACe . (HINDE MAKAPANIWALA ANG FISCAL NA ANG GANITONG KASENSITIBONG USAPAN, ANG PAGPLANO NG PAGPATAY, AY GAGAWIN BASTA BASTA SA ISANG PANGPUBLIKO NA LUGAR NA MAAARING MARINIG NG IBANG TAO NA WALANG KINALAMAN SA PAGDALO SA PULONG).

In making the resolution, the prosecutor gave credence to batilo’s evidence.

ITO ANG MGA DOKUMENTO NA ISINUMITE NI BATILO BILANG SUPORTA SA KANYANG DEPENSA: Booking Confirmation from PAL; Medical Certificates issued by City Health Office of Paranaque City; Covid Shield Travel Authority; Certification issued by Hearthwell Medical Center prior to his departure to General Santos City; Trace and protect Registration Certificate issued by Chief Administrative Officer of General Santos City; Certificate of Appearance issued by Barangay Captain of APOPONG, General Santos City; and Quarantine Clearance issued by City Health Officer of General Santos City.

Complainant, claim that these documents were falsified but no evidence was submitted by the complainants in proving their falsity and/or fabrication - Nabigyan ng pagkakataon pasinungalin ang ebidensiya ni batilo pero hinde ito nagawa ng kasalukuyang mayor at ng kanyang mga kapatid . The Certification and the persons who signed and issued the same, especially if issued by a government agency, enjoy the presumption of regularity - Ang mga ebidensiya ni batilo at karamihan ay issued ng ating gobyerno , sa rules of court ito ay may presumption ng katotohanan at ikokonsider na totoo hanggat walang ebidensya na magpapatunay na peke ang mga ito ..

Motion for reconsideration Motion for inhibition.

Resolusyon sa motion for inhibition. “while the motion for inhibition is based on flimsy and imaginary insinuations, in the interest of justice, to dispel any suspicions of bias and partiality, the motion is granted.” hinde po totoo na panalo na sila nung napagbigyan ang kanilang motion for inhibition Pinagbigyan lang sila kahit wala silang basehan para hinde masabi na mali ang dismissal at may kinikilingan ang fiscalya ng probinsya ng Batangas Hinde ibig sabihin mababaliktad na rin ang dismissal ng kaso.