How can decision making make influence ethical leadership?

[Audio] Hello ladies and gentlemen and good evening to you all, in this presentation we are going through how can decision making make influence ethical leadership.

[Audio] In the realm of ethical leadership, decision-making is the aspect that shapes values, behavior, and integrity. Leaders, guided by ethical standards and moral principles, exemplify a commitment to principled choices, influencing organizational culture profoundly. Ethical decision-making, prioritizing long-term outcomes over immediate gains, establishes trust and credibility with teams and stakeholders. Ethical leaders embrace accountability, ensuring transparency in their decision-making processes. By managing complex ethical dilemmas, they not only navigate challenges but set the standard for integrity. In a succinct manner, ethical leadership is about making decisions that resonate with values, fostering a culture where trust and ethical conduct thrive..

[Audio] The research aims to: 1. Investigate the correlation between decision-making procedures and the manifestation of ethical leadership traits within organizational settings. 2. Assess the influence of the big five personality traits on the ethical decision-making processes of leaders. 3. Explore the role of ethical decision-making in fostering a sense of dignity, moral principles, and responsibility among leaders. 4. Recognize the significance of ethical decision-making in augmenting the effectiveness of customer services. Through these objectives, the study aims to contribute valuable insights into the intricate interplay between decision-making processes, leadership traits, personality factors, moral values, and organizational outcomes, ultimately enhancing our understanding of ethical leadership in practical and impactful ways..

[Audio] The existing literature underscores the pivotal role of decision-making in shaping organizational commitment and employees' moral behaviors (Lee, Muhamat, & Yazid, 2019). This observation highlights the significance of effective decision-making processes in fostering a positive organizational culture and ethical conduct among employees. Moreover, in the context of today's dynamic and competitive business environment, adaptability to change is deemed essential (Metwally et al., 2019). This recognition underscores the need for leaders and organizations to possess the flexibility and resilience required to navigate the complexities of a rapidly evolving landscape. Furthermore, ethical leadership emerges as a key influencer, as noted by Kim, Lee, and Lee (2023), who emphasize its impact on the engagement levels of superiors in "unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB)." This insight suggests a crucial interplay between ethical leadership and potentially detrimental organizational behaviors, highlighting the importance of leadership styles in shaping the ethical fabric of a workplace..

[Audio] The study by Özbağ (2016) focused on unraveling the connection between five crucial personality traits and ethical leadership within executive positions. This research contributes valuable insights into the intricate interplay between individual traits and leadership behavior, shedding light on factors that may shape ethical leadership in organizational settings. Contrastingly, Aghighi (2019) contended that the characteristics of leaders serve as pivotal predictors of ethical leadership behavior. This perspective underscores the significance of personal attributes in determining how leaders navigate ethical considerations, emphasizing the role of inherent qualities in shaping ethical leadership. In a broader context, Al Halbusi et al. (2022) posited that ethical leadership plays a central role in influencing employee ethical behaviors, operating within a complex theoretical model that encompasses various factors. This observation underscores the multifaceted nature of ethical leadership's impact, extending beyond individual traits to encompass a broader organizational and interpersonal framework. Huhtala, Fadjukoff, and Kroger (2021) contributed insights into the cognitive processes of business leaders, elucidating how they articulate their reasoning and address moral conflicts. This perspective delves into the nuanced ways in which leaders navigate ethical challenges, offering a deeper understanding of the moral dimensions inherent in decision-making processes..

[Audio] Bulog and Grančić (2017) highlight the increasing significance of managers' ability to navigate complex ethical dilemmas within organizations, underscoring the evolving challenges faced by leadership in contemporary business landscapes. This recognition reinforces the idea that ethical considerations are not only prevalent but are growing in complexity, requiring leaders to possess the skills to navigate intricate ethical terrain. In the 21st century, organizations are placing heightened emphasis on ethical behaviors and value systems. This reflects a broader societal shift toward ethical considerations as integral components of organizational identity and success. The acknowledgment of the importance of ethical frameworks suggests that organizations recognize the impact of ethical considerations not only on their reputation but on their overall effectiveness and sustainability in a globalized and interconnected world..

[Audio] Research Strategy includes a cooperative effort between researchers and practitioners to address practical issues, enhance methodologies, or prompt transformations within a company. Thus, this specific research strategy has allowed the researcher to investigate real-time information while observing different decision-making scenarios impacting ethical leadership (Pandey and Pandey, 2021). While aiming to generate practical solutions, it is vital to involve both decision-makers and leaders in this research so that they can facilitate understanding and learning of how their decisions impact ethical leadership..

[Audio] The research methodology employed in this study involves collecting mixed data, with primary data collection for analysis and secondary data for the literature review, aligning with the approach advocated by Theofanidis and Fountouki (2018). This mixed-methods approach enhances the comprehensiveness of the research by combining the strengths of both primary and secondary data sources. Furthermore, the study utilizes simple random sampling for data collection, emphasizing its high convenience and time-saving nature. The adoption of simple random sampling is a strategic choice that facilitates an efficient and unbiased selection process, ensuring that each element in the population has an equal chance of being included in the sample. This approach enhances the generalizability of the findings and streamlines the data collection process, aligning with the pragmatic considerations of time efficiency in research..

[Audio] And here are the time line for the this research , starting from completing the research proposal, going through objectives, literature, data collection and analysis..

[Audio] The survey results reveal key insights into leadership perceptions and decision-making influences: 1. Leadership Styles: A notable 20% of respondents identified autocratic leadership as the most frequently employed style in critical conditions. This suggests a recognition of the importance of decisiveness and clear direction in certain situations. 2. Policy Influence: Decision-making procedures are significantly influenced by company guidelines and policies, with 28% of respondents citing their impact. This highlights the role of organizational structures in shaping leaders' approaches to decision-making. 3. Financial Objectives: A substantial 20% of respondents acknowledged the significant influence of achieving financial objectives on leadership decision-making. This underscores the business imperative of financial success and its impact on the choices leaders make. 4. Negative Perspectives: While the majority expressed neutral or positive views, a noteworthy 8% of individuals held a negative perspective. Specifically, 2% perceived leaders as "Unethical," and 6% categorized them as "Very Unethical." This indicates a minority but noteworthy concern about ethical conduct within leadership ranks. These findings collectively provide valuable insights into the prevalence of autocratic leadership, the impact of company policies, the significance of financial objectives, and the presence of negative perceptions regarding ethical behavior among leaders. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for organizations seeking to enhance leadership effectiveness and ethical standards..

[Audio] The survey outcomes reflect a predominantly positive perception of leaders' decisions, as highlighted by the following key findings: 1. Positive Impact: A substantial 72% of participants expressed a favorable view of leaders' decisions, with 24% acknowledging a "Significantly Positive Impact" and 48% recognizing a "Positive Impact." This suggests a prevailing confidence in the positive influence of leadership choices. 2. Neutral Stance on Responsibility: About 10% of participants remained impartial regarding the frequency with which leaders are held responsible for ethical decisions. This neutral perspective indicates a segment of respondents who may be undecided or perceive a balanced distribution of accountability. 3. Neutral View on Ethical Behavior Promotion: Similarly, 10% of participants adopted a neutral position concerning the impact of leadership on promoting ethical behavior. This suggests a subgroup with an undecided stance on the effectiveness of leadership in fostering ethical conduct within the organization. 4. Neutral Perception of Decision-Making Transparency:Another 10% of participants expressed a neutral position regarding the transparency and accessibility of decision-making processes. This neutrality implies a segment of respondents who may neither strongly affirm nor negate the transparency of leadership decision-making. In summary, the survey reveals an overall positive sentiment towards leaders' decisions, with a significant majority perceiving a favorable impact. However, the existence of neutral perspectives on responsibility, ethical behavior promotion, and decision-making transparency highlights the diversity of opinions among participants. Understanding these nuances is crucial for organizations aiming to enhance leadership effectiveness and address potential areas of concern..

[Audio] The survey findings indicate noteworthy insights into participant experiences and perceptions: 1. Involvement in Decision-Making: A lesser percentage, constituting 10% of participants, reported limited involvement in decision-making, with 8% indicating they were "Rarely Involved" and 2% stating they were "Never Involved." This suggests a subset of individuals who may not frequently participate in organizational decision-making processes. 2. Encounters with Ethical Dilemmas: Surprisingly, 60% of respondents revealed that they had never encountered situations where decision-making posed ethical dilemmas. This majority suggests a perception among a significant portion of participants that ethical challenges are not prevalent in their organizational contexts. 3. Resources and Training: Among those who had not encountered ethical dilemmas, a notable 40% attributed this to "Extensive Resources and Training," while 24% mentioned having "Some Resources and Training." This indicates a perceived positive correlation between the provision of resources and training and the absence of ethical dilemmas in decision-making..

Continued…. 2% Frequently involved Occasionally involved Rarely involved J Never involved Not applicable.

Continued….

[Audio] A largely positive view of leaders' ethical behaviour and its influence on the ethical climate of the organization is revealed by the analysis of ethical leadership and organizational decision-making. Leaders' decisions are heavily influenced by company guidelines, with ethical considerations coming in a close second. Even though the majority of respondents think well of their leaders and acknowledge their moral behaviour, there is still a lack of accountability when it comes to holding leaders responsible for morally questionable choices. The results show that ethical behaviour among staff members, open and honest decision-making procedures, and employee participation in decision-making are all strongly supported by leadership. First of all, more research is necessary to examine the disparity between accountability and perceived ethical behaviour. Examining how organizational structures, policies, or cultural quirks affect the process of really holding leaders responsible for moral choices could yield enlightening insights. It is necessary to better able to understand the effects of ethical decision-making on organizational culture if longitudinal studies or case analyses were carried out..

[Audio] It is important to look at how common ethical conundrums are and how they are identified during the decision-making process. A thorough investigation spanning industries or organizational sizes could pinpoint typical situations presenting moral conundrums, ascertain how staff members view and handle these situations, and assess the effectiveness of current moral frameworks. Finally, it's critical to look into how well resources and training courses foster moral decision-making. Ethical training initiatives could be optimized for maximum efficacy by conducting comparative studies that measure the impact of different training methods, evaluate their long-term effects on ethical behaviour, and gauge employees' perception of the resources' sufficiency. Such research projects can support the development of a culture of responsible decision-making and strengthen ethical frameworks within organizations..

References. Aghighi, A., 2019. Effect of Personality Characteristics' Dimensions on Ethical‎ Leadership. International Journal of Ethics and Society, 1(3), pp. 19-29. Al Halbusi, H., Tang, T.L.P., Williams, K.A. and Ramayah, T., 2022. Do ethical leaders enhance employee ethical behaviors? Organizational justice and ethical climate as dual mediators and leader moral attentiveness as a moderator--Evidence from Iraq's emerging market. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 11(1), pp. 105-135. Balasubramaniam, V., Salamzadeh, Y., Richardson, C. and Plakhin, A., 2021. The impact of leadership style on ethical decision-making, the moderating role of strategic thinking: a study among Malaysian managers. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 116). EDP Sciences. Bell, R.L., 2012. Using practical ethics to improve customer service on the frontline. Supervision, 73 (8), pp. 3-6. Bowen, P.W., Rose, R. and Pilkington, A., 2017. Mixed methods-theory and practice. Sequential, explanatory approach. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 5(2), p.10. Bulog, I. and Grančić, I., 2017. The benefits of business ethics-ethical behavior of decision makers: The empirical findings from Croatia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(4 S1), p. 9. Chikeleze, M.C. and Baehrend Jr, W.R., 2017. Ethical leadership style and its impact on decision‐making. Journal of Leadership Studies, 11(2), pp. 45-47. Emery, E., 2017. Leadership, Decision-Making, and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business & Economic Policy, 4(1), pp. 41–49. Available at: https://www.jbepnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_1_March_2017/6.pdf Grigoropoulos, J.E., 2019. The Role of Ethics in 21st Century Organizations. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(2), pp. 167-175..

References. Guo, K., 2022. The Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Employee Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Media Richness and Perceived Organizational Transparency. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p. 885515. Hicks, D. and Waddock, S., 2016. Dignity, wisdom, and tomorrow's ethical business leader. Business and Society Review, 121(3), pp. 447-462. Huhtala, M., Fadjukoff, P. and Kroger, J., 2021. Managers as moral leaders: Moral identity processes in the context of work. Journal of Business Ethics, 172, pp. 639-652. Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D.N. and De Hoogh, A.H., 2011. Ethical leader behavior and big five factors of personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, pp. 349-366. Khaireddin, M., 2015. The impact of the Big Five personality traits on the leadership styles: an empirical study applied on the branch managers of banks working at the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(9), p. 193. Kim, C., Lee, C. and Lee, G., 2023. Impact of Superiors’ Ethical Leadership on Subordinates’ Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: Mediating Effects of Followership. Behavioral Sciences, 13(6), p. 454. Lee, U.H.M.S., Muhamat, R. and Yazid, Z., 2019. The Influence Of Ethical Leadership Through Decision Making And Reinforcement Towards Employee Outcomes. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 3(2), pp. 40-51. Lim, W.M., O'Connor, P., Nair, S., Soleimani, S. and Rasul, T., 2023. A foundational theory of ethical decision-making: The case of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 158, p. 113579. Lindhout, P. and Reniers, G., 2021. Involving moral and ethical principles in safety management systems. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(16), p. 8511. Melnikovas, A., 2018. Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(2). Metwally, D., Ruiz-Palomino, P., Metwally, M. and Gartzia, L., 2019. How ethical leadership shapes employees’ readiness to change: The mediating role of an organizational culture of effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, p. 2493. Özbağ, G.K., 2016. The role of personality in leadership: Five factor personality traits and ethical leadership. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, pp. 235-242. Pandey, P. and Pandey, M.M., 2021. Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center. Scholl, J.A., Mederer, H.J. and Scholl, R.W., 2016. Leadership, ethics, and decision-making. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. New York: Springer, pp. 1-11. Soiferman, L.K., 2010. Compare and Contrast Inductive and Deductive Research Approaches. Online Submission. Theofanidis, D. and Fountouki, A., 2018. Limitations and delimitations in the research process. Perioperative Nursing-Quarterly scientific, online official journal of GORNA, 7(3 September-December 2018), pp. 155-163..