Simplified Integrated Process Engineering for Complex E/E Systems

1 of
Published on Video
Go to video
Download PDF version
Download PDF version
Embed video
Share video
Ask about this video

Page 1 (0s)

Simplified Integrated Process Engineering for Complex E/E Systems.

Page 2 (7s)

About Knot Consulting. Who We Are…. Our Process Expertise.

Page 3 (44s)

About Knot Consulting. 3. We Knot-Consulting was kick started by group of Subject matter experts and automotive enthusiast who wanted to contribute to quality of embedded systems and software. Our key differentiator is the value that we add by closely working with Engineering teams for Process transformation with Lean approach in Automotive SPICE and Functional Safety..

Page 4 (1m 20s)

About Us. 4. We Knot-Consulting was kick started by group of Subject matter experts and automotive enthusiast who wanted to contribute to quality of embedded systems and software. Our key differentiator is the value that we add by closely working with Engineering teams for Process transformation with Lean approach in Automotive SPICE, Functional Safety and Systems Engineering..

Page 5 (1m 39s)

Meet our Consultant…. Overall 16+ years of experience in Process consulting and 8+ years in automotive domain. Have supported OEM‘s and Tier 1 suppliers from Europe, U.S and China for ASPICE Implementation and Assessments. Consulting & Training Expertise in ASPICE v3.1 (Level 1 / 2 / 3) ; Performing Gap Analysis , Setting up Process Infrastructure, Process Definition and Deployment for ASPICE v3.1 – System Engineering, Software Engineering , Support and Supplier Management areas. Gap Analysis – Perform Exhaustive Gap Analysis of Processes Defined and Implementation against the desired model and identify gaps with proposed action plan / roadmap for gaps closure. Process Definition – Define Process Assets (Processes / Templates / Checklist / Guidelines / Policy) required to address the gaps. Trainings – Support in planning out for Deployment, Identifying Pilot projects , Provide On-Job training (Process and Role Based), Audits and Assessments to verify compliance. Define Measurement framework to measure the effectiveness of the processes and set up Process Improvement Framework to handle Process Improvements. Leading Software Process Improvement Journey and implementing Processes that adds value to the organization..

Page 6 (2m 34s)

Key Industry Challenges – SWOT. STRENGTHS Software Detailed Design , Coding and Unit Testing including Static and Dynamic Testing..

Page 7 (2m 54s)

Our Integrated Process Framework – ASPICE & Functional Safety.

Page 8 (3m 22s)

Our Integrated Process Framework – ASPICE & Functional Safety.

Page 9 (4m 1s)

Roadmap. 9. 1. 3. 5. 6. 4. 2. ASPICE (2019). Cybersecurity (ISO 21434).

Page 10 (4m 15s)

1. Automotive SPICE.

Page 11 (4m 21s)

V-Model from ASPICE Perspective. Acquisition Group (ACQ) ACQ.3 Contract Supplier Monitoring ACQII Technical Requirements ACQ.12 Legal and Administrative Requirements ACQ.13 Project Requirements ACQ14 Request for ACQ.15 Supplier Qualification Supply Process Group SPL) SPLI Supplier Tendering System Engineering Group (SYS) SYS.I Requirements Elicitation SYS.2 System Requirements Analysis SYS.3 System Architectural Design SYS.5 System Qualification Test SYS.4 System Integration and Integration Test Software Engineering Process Group (SWE) SWE.I Software Requirements Analysis SWE.2 Software Architectural Design SWE.3 %ftware Detailed and unit Construction SWE.6 Software Qualification Test SWE.5 Software Integration and Integration Test SWE.4 Software Unit Verification Supporting Process Group (SUP) SUP.I Quality Assurance SUP.2 Verifkation SUP.4 Joint Review SUP.7 D-ocumentation Management Process Group (MAN) MAN.3 Project Management MAN.5 Risk Management MAN.6 Measurement Reuse Group (REU) REU.2 Reuse Program Management Process Improvement Group (PIM) PIM.3 Prxess Improvement.

Page 12 (4m 52s)

Our Approach – ASPICE. Gap Analysis Process Assets Definition Process Trainings and Audits Internal Assessments Final Assessments Perform Gap Analysis of the Process Areas identified in Slide 7 Identify Gaps / Process Improvements against ASPICE v3.1 CL1 Requirements Identify Action Plan (Definition and Deployment) for closure of Gaps Define Process Assets – Processes , Templates and Checklist for scope identified in Slide 5 Provide feedback / 1 round of re-review Baseline Process Assets. Perform Process Trainings (On Job ) Perform Process compliance and Work Product Audits Perform Internal Assessment against V3.1 model Communicate report with Gaps Perform Final Assessment against V3.1 model Communicate report with Gaps Deliverables: Gap Analysis report Deliverables: Process Assets Baselined Deliverables: Audit reports Deliverables: Assessment report Deliverables: Assessment report Final Assessment is not considered as scope and will be supported by our Assessment partner..

Page 13 (5m 27s)

Highlights SWOT analysis of the current MBRDI software processes against ASPICE model will be performed to identify gaps / process improvements against the ASPICE v3.1 model. Identify Actions in two categories – Process Definition and Implementation action for gaps closure..

Page 14 (5m 53s)

Gap Assessment (Complimentary) – Why?. Performing SWOT – Strengths Weakness and Opportunities for improvement Analysis at the Process level will help identify / uncover underlying issues that results in Poor Product Quality and more rework. Understand the capability level of the process that sets a benchmark for Process Improvement. Uncover the ambiguity in Roles and Responsibilities with Hand overs and Interfaces. Measure our Process Efficiency and Effectiveness. Identify Key factors that contribute to the Product Quality thus establishing a simplified process framework..

Page 15 (6m 15s)

Highlights Review of Work Products also includes Process Compliance Work Product Audit The Audits will ensure compliance will be met with improved quality and less defects / rework. Ensure that Bi-directional traceability compliance is achieved and thus ensuring that all features are implemented in the project..

Page 16 (6m 46s)

Supplier Quality and Internal QA as a Service. Daimler Supplier — QA (Knot onsulting Supplier 1 Supplier 2 Supplier QA - Model Supplier QA Engineer will be deployed to work with Daimler to manage the Supplier Release Quality. Supplier QA Engineer will perform Process Compliance Audit, Work Product Audit and Release Quality Audit to ensure Quality of released products. Supplier QA Engineer will monitor the Performance of the Suppliers and prepare score card with metrics defined and actuals. Supplier 3.

Page 17 (7m 5s)

Our Deliverables - Sample. MAN. Table of Conterts psojECT Pt.»a. 1.1 1.2 _ 1.3 1.3 2 in • 2 OUE•CTMS....... 2.1 Ovnew._.. 2.2 2.3 2.4 & 2.5 1 Cnan.

Page 18 (7m 19s)

Our Training and Coaching Framework. Process Awareness Training Role Based Training Set the Training Goal and the expected outcome Walkthrough of ASPICE Base Practices for VDA scope processes and actions required for implementation. Walkthrough of work product characteristics for processes. Duration: 10 hrs. Mode: Web training. Set the Training Goal and the expected outcome Walkthrough the Process expectations and actions for the Role identified. Summarize the roles and responsibilities from ASPICE perspective Summarize the work products that the Role is responsible for. Explain the Interfaces / Touch points with other processes. Duration: * Depending on the Role agreement . Mode: Web training. Takeaway: Soft copy of the Presentation and Mind maps Takeaway: Soft copy of the Presentation and Mind maps.

Page 19 (7m 52s)

2. Functional Safety - ISO 26262.

Page 20 (7m 58s)

Functional Safety Life Cycle. Part 3 Alignment Item Definition Hazard Analysis And Risk Assessment Functional Safety Concept Technical Safety Concept System Architecture Part 4 System Safety Analysis Release for Production Functional Safety Assessment Safety Validation Item Integration & Testing eSi n co HW Lifecycle W Lifec cle.

Page 21 (8m 10s)

Functional Safety – Our Capabilities. S No Application OEM / Tier 1 Functional Safety Scope Part 2 Part 3 Part 4,5 & 6 Part 7 Part 8 1 Fuel Tank system Tier 1 DIA, Safety Plan, Item, HARA, FSC,TSC, FMEA,DFMEA, FMEDA, PFMEA, CCF, DFA safety Case, anomaly reports, Trainings      2 ADAS_Cleaning system (Level 3,4,5) Tier 1 DIA, Safety Plan, Item, HARA, FSC,TSC, FMEA,DFMEA, FMEDA, PFMEA, CCF, DFA safety Case, anomaly reports, Trainings      3 ADAS_controle system (Level 3) OEM Safety Process, FMEA, FSC,TSC, V&V plan, FMEA, FTA,FMEDA, CCF, DFA, RHF  4 BMS (800V) system OEM Safety Process, FMEA, FSC,TSC, V&V plan, FMEA, FTA,FMEDA, CCF, DFA, RHF.  5 BMS (300V) system OEM Item def, HAZOP, FSC, TSC, FMEA, FTA, FMEDA, CCF, DFA, RHF.   6 BMS (72V) system OEM Item def, HAZOP, FSC, TSC, FMEA, FTA, FMEDA, CCF, DFA, RHF, DIA, plan, trainings,    7 EPT Tier 1 TSC, TSR, FMEA, FTA, DFMEA, CCF, DFA  8 Hybrid PT Tier 1 Item, HARA,FSC, TSC, FMEA, FTA   9 Engine Management System OEM Software Development, FFI, CCF, Matlab.

Page 22 (9m 7s)

Product Development Life Cycle. Item definition Initiation of the safety lifecycle Hazard analysis and risk assessment Functional safety concept Product development system level E o Operation Planning Production Planning Other technologies Controllability Hardware level Software level External measures Release for production Production Operation, service and decommissioning.

Page 23 (9m 17s)

Experiences and KNOW HOW in Safety Development.. Project 1 - SOP Development of rocess- and processor monitoring SW (?GAS Level 2 and 3) for powertrain controllers, the several applications are electrical cars, hybrid and fuel cell related up to ASIL D Project 2 - SOP Safety system assessment and development of process monitoring SW for direct combustion engines for passenger cars Project 3 — B-Sample Safety system analysis and development of entire Safety Concept (HW, all SW levels) for a battery system controller (BMS), pilot application is an hybrid bus.

Page 24 (9m 38s)

Experiences and KNOW HOW in Safety Development.. Project 4 - SOP Functional Safety Management and Development of process- and processor monitoring SW Level 2 and 3) for powertrain controller HCU) pilot application is an electrical car Project 5 - SOP Development of Battery Management System Functional safety management, Safety Design and implementation Project 6 - Concept Entire Control Systems development for inverter with highest safety requirements, application is a torque vectoring system in passenger car.

Page 25 (9m 54s)

Our Recommended Approach - SEOC.

Page 26 (10m 1s)

Our Sample Work Products. DEVELOPMENT INTERFACE AGREEMENT (DIA) Iso 26262:2018 safety A t v tl Sat"' Activmes md Manag—t of 224 232 228 rules distributed the so pun esses SO • 255 t 2562 2564 &552 2855 26SS 2665 uss 26S2 2663 2 sss 2654 26ss 2666 81st.

Page 27 (10m 45s)

3. Integrated Process Framework.

Page 28 (10m 51s)

Plug and Play Process Framework – ASPICE , FuSa and Cybersecurity (Concept Phase).

Page 29 (11m 7s)

Integrated DIA. 2 2.1 2.1.4 2.2 22 1 22 2 22 3 22 4 22 5 22 6 221 22 8 2.3 28 1 Integrated DIA Safety Activities & Work Products Planning and Management of Functional Safety Overall Safety Management Organization-specific rules and processes for functional safety Evidence of competence management Evidence of a quality management system Identified saf anoma re Its Intedaces within distributed development Su lier selectionre It Development interface agreement (DIA) Suppliers safe Plan Confirmation Review of the suppliers safety plan Functional safety audit Functional safety assessment Functionalsaf assessment report Supply agreement between customer and supplier Project Dependent Safety Management Impact analysis at the item lew Confirmation review of the impact analysis Impact ana at the element level if applicable) Type Header Safety Activity Work Product Work Prffct Work Product Work Product Safety Activity Work Product Work Product Work Product Work Product Work Product Work Product Work Product Work Product Safety Activity Work Product Work Product Work Product Reference 262622018 26 5. I 2662 26 58 86 5. I 8552 26 26 56 26 56 86 26 55 2662.

Page 30 (11m 43s)

Project Case with Safety and Security arguments. Safety Case Evidence (according to SPI Work Product Expected start Document (link) date Expected finish date Customer Responsible milestone 2 Management of Functional Safety Or amzatons cific rules and processes for functional saf Evidence of competence management Evidence ofaqual' mana ement stem Identified safety anomaly repots, if applicable Impact analysis at the item Evel 1m ctan atelementlevel, ifa icable Safety plan S case Release for prcålCtion report Evidence of safety management regarding production, operation, semce and decommissioning Confirmation measures Confirmation review of the npact analysis Confirmation review of the hazard analysis and risk assessment Confirmation review of the safety plan Confirmation review ofthe functionalsafe concept Cmfirmation review of the technical safety concept Confirmation review of the integration and test strateg Confirmation review of the safety validation specification Confirmation review of the safety analyses and the dependent failure analyses Confirmation review ofthe completeness ofthesafe case 0 Product Status (Drop•down) To be defined To be defined To be defined To defined To be defined To be defined To be defined To be defined To be defined To be defined To be defined To be defined To be defined To be defined To be defined To be To be defined To be defined To be defined.

Page 31 (12m 23s)

Verification Method. Exhaustive List of Verification methods to comply to ISO 26262 and Security..

Page 32 (12m 32s)

4. Process Lever – Process Modelling.

Page 33 (12m 39s)

Industry Specific Requirements can be mapped to the Internal Processes Defined..

Page 34 (13m 33s)

Our Solution – Process Lever. Knot-Consulting’s Process Lever is a cost-effective solution for defining a Process Library to manage all Processes, Workflows, Procedures with Activities / Tasks, Roles and Responsibilities and Templates. Frond end Quality Management System that can be assessed by end Process users to understand the Processes , Roles and Responsibilities and download the templates that can be used for Projects. Flexible Library structure that allows to create Organization specific Process and Customer specific process by re-using the Org. specific library Industry Specific standards can be stored in Process Lever library and can be assessed by employees..

Page 35 (14m 1s)

Features– Process Lever. Creating Integrated workflows with Value streams. Workflows mapped to Input and Output work products with clear relationships. RACI relationships with Activities and vise versa for traceability. Process Interfaces with relations between Processes, Activities, Work products, Roles and many more… Establishing Compliances to Industry standards – Automotive SPICE, CMMI, ISO 9001, ISMS 27001, Customer specific standards and many more… Export of Activities in MPP for efficient / effective planning..

Page 36 (14m 25s)

Some of Key Customers….. Meet Flex: One Of The Most Crucial Companies You May Not Be Familiar With.

Page 37 (14m 52s)

Case Study. Customer: OEM, U.S – BMS system Problem Statement: Business driven ASPICE process improvement to improvise Product Quality Support : Gap Analysis, Process Harmonization, Training and Internal Assessment for CL3 ASPICE v3.1. Value addition: Improved Product quality with 50% Internal defects reduction and Customer delivered defects Customer: OEM, Europe Inverter Software Development Problem Statement: Missed Features in Releases and high defects leakage. Support : Harmonization of Processes using ASPICE v3.1 and KGAS Value addition: Compliance matrix to demonstrate standard compliance to ASPICE and KGAS quality requirements to the Processes defined. Customer: Tier 1 U.S – EPS system Problem Statement: No mechanism to handle Process Improvements. Support : Setting up Process Governance Board and mechanism to handle Process Improvements by deploying 1 process Engineer. Value addition: Re-work in projects reduced by 10% in cycle 1. Customer: Tier 1 China – Advanced Lighting System Problem Statement: Business Trigger to comply to BMW Quality Standard Requirement. Support: Setting up Processes aligned to BMW quality standard. Value addition: Compliance matrix to demonstrate standard compliance to BMW standard to the Processes defined..

Page 38 (15m 39s)

. Thanks!. Any questions? You can find me at: ram@knot-consulting.com Knot-Consulting.com.