Farmer Protest Presentation (1)

Published on Slideshow
Static slideshow
Download PDF version
Download PDF version
Embed video
Share video
Ask about this video

Scene 1 (0s)

[Audio] Welcome to our presentation on the role of media during the farmer's protest in India. Our objective is to reveal the biased inaccurate and deceptive information provided by conventional media outlets about the protests. We will discuss the impartial and fair reports given by some media outlets and the pro-government reporting style of the conventional media. Our presentation will help you understand the impact of media on public opinion and the role of media in shaping the narrative about the protests..

Scene 2 (32s)

[Audio] Discuss the Media's Role during the Farmer's Protest in India. This topic is of great importance as it highlights the crucial role the media plays in shaping public opinion and providing accurate information to the public. In this presentation we will discuss how media outlets have covered the Farmer's Protest in India and how they have addressed the concerns raised by the public..

Scene 3 (57s)

[Audio] We found that some media outlets published inaccurate or misleading information about the farmers' protest which caused confusion and mistrust among the general population. For instance some sources claimed that opposition groups funded the protestors which was false and contributed to public doubt..

Scene 4 (1m 14s)

[Audio] Discuss the biases of conventional media in supporting the government during the farmers' protest in India. Derogatory labels such as khalistani and anti-nationals are used to undermine legitimate criticism. The media has been seen to be biased toward the government and their portrayal of the farmers has been framed in a negative manner. This bias has led to a distorted view of the situation which has hindered the farmers' ability to get their message across and has contributed to the ongoing conflict. It is important for the media to be neutral and unbiased in their reporting in order to provide a fair and accurate representation of the situation..

Scene 5 (1m 53s)

[Audio] Rewritten: Be mindful of the media's reporting style when consuming information about the protest. Removed: We urge you to be mindful of the media's reporting style when consuming information about the protest..

Scene 6 (2m 7s)

[Audio] We are discussing the coverage of certain media platforms during the conflict farmers' protest in India. This method frequently twisted the truth by emphasizing strikingly dramatic imagery and diverse language creating a diverse story that set government officials in opposition to farmers. This coverage has added to the situation's complexity by aiding in disseminating speculations and false information. Pro-Government style of reporting brought about biased coverage. Independent coverage provided a clear picture to the public..

Scene 7 (2m 42s)

[Audio] The media played a crucial role during the farmers' protest in India. They offered a platform for the farmers to voice their concerns and demands which were heard by a larger audience through broadcasting. This helped raise awareness and support for the farmers' causes. The media provided diverse perspectives shaping public perception by engaging in subjective framing. They were able to pressure the government to take action resulting in negotiations to resolve the issue. The media was effective in polarizing and spreading false information which impacted the formulation of policies. Overall the media played a crucial role in driving policy change during the farmers' protest in India..

Scene 8 (3m 25s)

[Audio] Our research findings show that state-owned media presented a biased picture of the Farmer's Protest in India undermining farmers' complaints and emphasizing the government's efforts to appease them. This was done to influence public perception and suppress critical reports. Journalists who reported critically on the events were detained or faced sedition charges. Pro-government bots and trolling groups used social media to spread propaganda and false information discrediting the farmers' protest. Our research reveals that the government used the media to sway public opinion and suppress critical reports..

Scene 9 (4m 3s)

[Audio] Our research has shown that government control over media reporting has raised serious concerns regarding press freedom and the repression of the rebellion. Correct data regarding the conflict and government reaction has been hard to obtain by civilians due to skewed reporting restrictions and reporter arrests. This has resulted in global censure and divided public sentiment. The government's actions have been criticized globally with many condemning the oppression of opponents on social platforms and the influence the government has had on the media. We urge that media houses and governments work together to ensure that media reporting is fair and unbiased and that the rights of citizens are protected..

Scene 10 (4m 47s)

[Audio] We discuss the role of media during the farmers' protest in India. According to the information media outlets have purposely framed events to align with the government's narrative. Specifically footage of police hitting farmers was initially presented by several outlets which then created propaganda to paint the farmers as anti-national and politically motivated. However media outlets manipulated or distorted information in many cases with some being accused of pushing governmental propaganda. Furthermore concerns about censorship on social platforms have emerged. We believe that the media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and influencing the outcome of conflicts. Therefore it's important for the media to be responsible and ethical in their reporting..

Scene 11 (5m 34s)

[Audio] Social media played a crucial role during the farmers' protest in India. The protestors used social media platforms to connect with supporters worldwide..

Scene 12 (5m 44s)

[Audio] This presentation will discuss the role of media during the protest by farmers in India. The farmer's association has used social platforms to share updates coordinate with other rallying organizations and raise awareness of the latest agricultural laws. However the government has also used these platforms to spread false information and rumors. Social media has played a significant role in spreading awareness and mobilizing support for the farmers. Farmers have shared their side of the story through social platforms while the government has used these platforms to disinform the public..

Scene 13 (6m 19s)

[Audio] We highlight the power of citizen journalism in shaping public opinion and bringing about positive change. Through social platforms citizen journalists were able to share their experiences speak openly and present complaints to the general public. They recorded claims from the government misinformations police violence and the efforts done to suppress the farmers. They challenged official statements and compelled the government to respond to the acquisitions by supplying self-sufficient and frequent recordings of the gruesome occurrences. Citizen journalism became the voice of the oppressed farmers. It challenged the official storyline regarding the conflict. Citizen journalists became fact-checkers for proliferating false information. It heightened awareness which led to the mobilization of support. In conclusion citizen journalism played a vital role in bringing attention to the farmers' protests and challenging the official narrative. It gave a voice to the marginalized and helped to mobilize support for the cause..

Scene 14 (7m 20s)

[Audio] Crafted perceptions through influence. Highlighted multifaceted impacts of media houses. Inspire future research and improve media coverage..

Scene 15 (7m 31s)

[Audio] The article by Behl emphasizes the importance of diverse voices in the democratic process. The article by Chatterjee discusses ongoing tensions between farmers and government over agricultural reform. The article by Chaudhuri and others explores the role of social networks in promoting sustainable agricultural practices. The case analysis by Das examines marketing strategies employed by farmers during protest. The article by Neogi and others analyzes sentiment and classification of tweets related to protest. Lastly the article by Sen and others examines bias in media coverage of protest. These pieces provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex issues surrounding the farmers' protest in India and the role of media in shaping public opinion and policy..