2nd Quarter School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment

[Audio] 2nd Quarter School Monitoring, Evaluation and Adjustment School Year 2021- 2022.

[Audio] School Profile. School Profile.

[Audio] Figures show the final enrolment of Sinandigan Elementary School for School Year 2021 – 2022. Data reveal that Grade 3 has the highest enrolment ( 19%) and Grade 6 has the lowest enrolment ( 10%)..

[Audio] Data reveals that the teaching staff of Sinandigan Elementary School is all Teacher I position and are females..

[Audio] Sinandigan Elementary School SMEA Team. Curriculum Support System Persons Responsible Designation Teachers Anna Lissa D. Berio School Guidance Teacher Coordinator Materials Remelyn F. Julian PTA Coordinator ICT Gierny C. Julian ICT Coordinator Assessment Maria Aileen B. Escosio Testing Coordinator Technical Assistance Liza O. Abayon Training and Development Coordinator Partnership Aisa D. Compuesto ASP Coordinator School Leadership Noel S. Del Mendo School Head School MEA Coordinator Flordeliza J. Javil.

[Audio] MEA Key Processes Performed. S MEA Key Processes Performed.

Data for SMEA report were gathered through different school reports and records of coordinators:.

Meeting of SMEA Team for the prioritization/ segmentation of the three (3) prioritized KPIs to pinpoint significant areas/concerns and characterization of segments that caused the low KPIs and deciding TA needed and the persons involved ..

2nd Quarter Performance Leading Indicators.

Access.

No. of PARDO/SARDO or NLPA (No Longer Participating in School Activities) Male Female Total Kindergarten 0 0 0 Grade 1 0 0 0 Grade 2 0 0 0 Grade 3 0 0 0 Grade 4 0 0 0 Grade 5 0 0 0 Grade 6 0 0 0 (K to 6) Total 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL 0 0 0.

SCHOOL YEAR MALE FEMALE TOTAL 2019-2020 0 0 0 2020-2021 0 0 0 2021-2022 0 0 0.

Comparative Performance. The Graph displays that the school has no PARDO/SARDO or NLPA for 3 consecutive years..

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOV). OOLS DIVISION OF ELEMENTARY CONSOLIDATED REPORT ON NUMBER OF PARDO ( n t Risk or Dropping Out) and N LPA (NO Longer participating in School Activities) Inclusive dates April I to June 30, 2022 Grade Level Kinder Grade I Grade Grade Grade IV G d e VI Total Prepared by: GIER Male 0 0 ULIAN PARDO/NLPA Fern a le 0 0 0 0 0 Tota I 0 0 NOEL S DE Principal I School Planning Officer : Sitio Sigma. Nurnber: lag 2B Address; ph.

Quality.

Number of Learners with Failing Grades. The data reveals that among the six grade levels, there were no learners with failing grades in 3rd grading/quarter in all subject areas ..

Comparative Performance on the Number of Learners with Failing Grades.

Comparative Performance. The Graph shows that the school was able to achieve its target because of the zero actual result of no. of learners with failing grades..

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOV). Department ot Cbutation V' We•tern DIVISION or CAPIZ SINANDIGAN ELEMENTARY CAPO CONSOLIDATED REPORT ON NUMBER OF LEARNERS WIT" FAILING GRADES 3rd Quarter per Subiect Area Inclusive dates April 1 to June 30, 2022 NUMBER OF LEARNERS WITH FAILING Grade Level Kinder Grade I Grade II Grade Ill Grade V Grade VI Total Prepared by: GRADES Male o Total Female Noted: NOEL D L MkND0 rincipal I GIE C. JULIAN Ehool Planning Officer Address: Sitio Sinand@an, Mianay, Sigma, Capiz Contact Number: 09500174828 Email Address: .ph.

Breakdown of KPIs 2ND Quarter.

KPI 1. Two (2) Prioritized KPIs. KPI 2. SBFP Implementation.

Access.

The table shows that in Hiligaynon language there were 11 total male learners and 2 females who are under the Full Refresher Reading Proficiency Level while in Filipino language, there were 5 males and1female, for English language, 6 male and 1 female learners also belong to the same level which means they will be considered as learners who need more attention and remediation to achieve the Grade Ready Reading Proficiency Level. ..

The table shows that out 48 beneficiaries only 272 or 76% were claimed on time. Grades 1, 2, & 5 have the lowest percentage of Nutritious Food Packs claimed on time..

Prioritized.

Prioritized KPI No. 1 Priorities Curriculum Support System Characterization Proposed Intervention Date of Implementa-tion TA Needed From Whom? & Date Comprehensive Rapid Literacy Assessment Grades One, Two and Three Teachers Teachers 27 learners out of 76 total enrolment from grades one, two and three or 36% out of 100% belong to Moderate Refresher Reading Proficiency Level Most of the parents clamoured that they are not capable in teaching their children due to their educational attainment. The School Head together with the advisers called the attention of parents of those learners who need more attention and remediation. The advisers must conduct home visitation and remedial reading to those learners who have difficulty in reading to support and facilitate their learning. April to May 2022 April-May 2022 Parent-Teacher Partner-ship Parent-Teacher Partner-ship Teacher Adviser/ April- May 2022 Teacher Adviser/ April- May 2022.

Prioritized KPI No. 1 Priorities Curriculum Support System Characterization Proposed Intervention Date of Implementa-tion TA Needed From Whom? & Date 3. SBFP Implementation Delayed Claiming of Nutritious Food Packs by the Parents Grades 1, 2 & 5 Teachers School Leadership & Management Community Industry Relevance & Partnership 3 out of 7 teachers find difficulty to contact parents through cellphone due to poor internet connectivity The School Head failed to organized a core group to facilitate the delivery of nutritious food packs beneficiaries in case if nobody claimed 18 out 48 parents failed to claim on time Assigned parent leader to contact those parents Organize group of parents to deliver the packs of bread and fruits observing the proper health protocols Organized a core group to facilitate packs of bread and fruits delivery observing the proper health protocols Ask the help of BHW leaders Tap the PTA officers April to June 2022 April-June 2022 Parent-Teacher Partner-ship Parent-Teacher Partner-ship Teacher Adviser/ April-June 2022 Teacher Adviser/ April- June 2022.

Performance Summary.

Summary of Quarterly Accomplishments.

KRA PHYSICAL #Target Activities #of Actual Accomplishment %of Accomplishment 1. Leading Strategically 2 2 100% 2. Managing School Operations and Resources 2 2 100% 3. Focusing on Teaching and Learning 3 3 100% 4. Developing Self and Others 1 1 100% 5. Building Connections 1 1 100% Total 9 9 100%.

Accomplished Activities.

KRA 1: LEADING STRATEGICALLY- ACCOMPLISHED ACTIVITIES.

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOVs). APPROVAL SHEET Ehool Based In-%rvice Training on Remedial Reading Using Fuller to Address the Reading Needs of Distant Learners and Innovation prepa by: NOELS. L MENDO p cipall ewe< GERO ODICTA, OIC public ools District LADA J. RES, PhD SEPS-HRD Training and Development Chair Approval: SEGUN NA F. PhD Chief Education Supervisor Curriculum Impl tation Division MAR N . DESTREZA, EdD Chi Ed tion Supervisor ance and Operatffp 0. JR„EdD, CESO V Schools Division Superintendent.

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOVs). LAC e standards ( ppm Sta rds fu 2, To the — pmding 3, To ther wu-tice using SAT - RPMS IPCRF ELEMENTARY Sitio CELL 2021-2022 on Sw set in 3. Grade 4, - RPW 5. Activity m SAT - Tool of — RPMS Date: Apr" L 2022 SAT - S. Mendo A. ODICTA OK-Public Dis#ict.

KRA 2: Managing School Operations and Resources- ACCOMPLISHED ACTIVITIES.

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOVs). OF WORKS Waw 4 bag 022 cement mastic hose % Arts Teacher.

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOVs).

KRA 3: Focusing on Teaching and Learning- ACCOMPLISHED ACTIVITIES.

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOVs). of 2022 ros and tests F2F Of TOS F2F of TOS and FIF of TOS and F2F F2F of F 2F inspection of sum te s" Hea d Head Men s. '0-2022.

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOVs). LAC e standards ( ppm Sta rds fu 2, To the — pmding 3, To ther wu-tice using SAT - RPMS IPCRF ELEMENTARY Sitio CELL 2021-2022 on Sw set in 3. Grade 4, - RPW 5. Activity m SAT - Tool of — RPMS Date: Apr" L 2022 SAT - S. Mendo A. ODICTA OK-Public Dis#ict.

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOVs). Name Name of FattEr R e publk Of Ph i "p Department Of Region VI-we-Stern V i Saps of Capiz District Of Sigma "NAWGAN ELEMENTA Sitio Mianay, HOME VISIT FORM Mhday Gender f g Contact Name of Contact r REASON FOR HOME VISITATION: REMARKS /AGREEMENT: c. WRE OVER NAME PARENT'S prepued by: STUDENT'S SIGNA n c. Lon OVER PRINTED NAME.

KRA 4: Developing Self and Others- ACCOMPLISHED ACTIVITIES.

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOVs). VIRTUAL OREINTATION ATTENDED PTA FORUM SERIES. Thanks! Your response was submitted. nnt or get answers Submit another response Powered by Microsoft Forms I The owner of this form has not provided a privacy statement as to how they will use your response data. Do not provide personal or sensitive information. EPE: PROCESS FLO. REVISED SCHOOL SAFETY ASSESSMEN (SSAT) May 26, 2022 Your response has been recorded..

KRA 5: Building Connections- ACCOMPLISHED ACTIVITIES.

MODES OF VERIFICATION (MOV). C ducted Meeting/BaIitaan with Parents of learners.

Unaccomplished Activities (None).

Financial Report.

Source of Fund Amount to be Utilized Actual Amount Utilized Percentage of Utilization 1. MOOE P63, 400.00 P63, 400.00 100% 2. PTA 0 0 0% 3. Alumni 0 0 0% 4. Barangay 0 0 0% 5. SEF 0 0 0% 6. Others (SBFP) P1,584.00 P1,584.00 100% Total P64, 984.00 P64, 984.00 100%.

Facilitating Factors Follow the approved Request for Cash Advance (RCA) in Procurement. Follow strictly the guidelines in procurement and liquidation processes. Request the help of the School Property Custodian and School Treasurer to review the accuracy of the report. Best Practices 1. Reporting the programs and projects within the quarter to internal and external stakeholders..

Issues Late downloading of MOOE fund. Hindering Factors Some materials to be procured based on the RCA budget do not jibe with the present price in the market due to price adjustment. Actions to be taken Adjustment in the NORSA is applied..