Scene 1

Scene 2

The Case for Change (Why a new system is needed?) Existing System of Data Collection and Reporting Limitations of the current monitoring system What is the School Improvement Framework (SIF)?  How does SIF address limitations of the current  monitoring system?  MEAs/AEOs role in the SIF Pilot Next Step

Scene 3

Current system of data collection and Reporting

1000 MEAs  visit schools every month to collect data on 14 indicators Data recorded and uploaded in  real-time  through tablets

Targeted reports based on data collected on 14 indicators  provided to every Education Manager  Pre-DRC  and  DRC  meetings to review district performance CEO Conference  to review provincial performance  This data is also used in  province level reviews of the sector’s overall performance

Scene 4

*Target value is average of different targets across districts

Scene 5

Current system of data collection and Reporting (Example)

May
1
2
89.89
3
4
5
6
198.293
8
97.01
II
12
13
15
16
LND
Student Attendance (K-12)
Teacher Presence
Head Teacher Presence
Availability of Boundary Wall
Availability of Drinking Water
Availability of Furniture
Classroom Observation
Safe Buildings
NSB Timeliness
NSB Utilization
Data Health
Sufficiency of toilets
Retention (K-12)
School Hygiene
Partial Facility
March
90.59
93.1
93.87
89.96
94.16
98.7
93.51
96.7
0.99
54.06
86.91
77.78
95
86.67
2.6
April
78.59
91.09
93.54
93.68
94.09
99.15
97.41
94.04
96.62
0.99
74.69
49.79
82.16
86.56
3.02
1.19
.6
3.
(49)
2.72
Target
82
90
90
90
98
95
70
80
98
90
90
90
77.9
97
80
1

Screenshot from the data pack (Rawalpindi District) District aggregate performance

Scene 6

DEO - Tehsil wise performance
This is a tehsil level performance of your district on various indicators.
on Target
Below Target
Far from Target
Indicator #
Tehsil
GUJAR KHAN
RAH UTA
SYEDAN
KOTU
SATTIAN
MURREE
RAWALPINDI
TAXILA
Student Attendance
(K-12)
Teacher
Presence
Retention
(K-12)
Availability Of
Availability Of
LND
Availability Of
Furniture
On Time
Resolution
Performa c e
1>7.411

Screenshot from the data pack (Rawalpindi District) TEHSIL aggregate performance

NOTICE: THE NUMBER OF INDICATORS TO REFLECT TEHSIL PERFORMANCE HAS BEEN REDUCED TO EIGHT  EACH INDICATOR HAS BEEN GIVEN THE SAME WEIGHT REGARDLESS OF THEIR RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

Scene 7

Indicator #
School
GGHS DATA BHATT
(37360122)
GGHS ARAZI HASSANAL
(37360129)
GGHS JHONGAL
(37360137)
GHS NABAN JANJUA
(37360237)
GGHS SUKHO
(37360061)
1
Student
Attenda nce
(K-12)
8
85.6
2
Teacher
Presence
86.9
3
Rete ntion
(K-12)
94.2
4
5
Partially
Functional
Facility
Availability Availability
of BW
of DW
6
Availability Of
Performance
Furnitu re

Screenshot from the data pack (Rawalpindi District) SCHOOL PERFORMANCE

NOTICE: THE NUMBER OF INDICATORS TO REFLECT SCHOOL PERFORMANCE HAS BEEN REDUCED TO SIX EACH INDICATOR HAS BEEN GIVEN THE SAME WEIGHT REGARDLESS OF THEIR RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

Scene 8

Lack of a meaningful framework for organizing data:  While the data is collected on 14 indicators, it is not organized in terms of key performance domains

Basis for determining the status of schools’ effectiveness is limited :  Indicators are arbitrarily dropped when looking at school performance and equal weight is given to all indicators in calculation of performance

No feedback is provided to schools:   No visibility on the status of schools in reports at Tehsil and higher levels

Scene 9

What is the School Improvement Framework (SIF)?

The School Improvement Framework is an improved mechanism of monitoring and support that will bring focus on schools.  A framework that brings focus on schools by: Meaningfully organizing indicators into  key domains of school performance ; Categorizing schools by their  needs   for improvement  Providing   feedback  to the school for self-appraisal Generate actions  aimed at improving specific aspects of school at appropriate levels of DEA.

Scene 10

How will the SIF overcome limitation of the existing system?

1. SIF Meaningfully organizes indicators into  4 key domains of school performance (DSPs)  Student Achievement and Personal Development :   This includes  three indicators  covering various aspects of student participation, including attendance, graduation, and other indicators. Teachers and Teaching :   This domain responds to the centrality of teachers to learning outcomes. It has  five indicators  related to teacher adequacy, presence, professional development and teaching practices.  Leadership/ School Support :   This domain includes  five indicators  on headteacher availability and presence, and some aspects of their instructional leadership to the teaching staff.  School Environment:   This domain will include  ten indicators  covering various aspects of school environment.

Scene 11

S/N Domain of School Performance Number of Indicators Domain weight 1. Student participation and personal development 3 40 points 2. Teachers and teaching 5 40 points 3. Leadership and support 5 10 points 4. School environment 10 10 points   Total 23 100 points

Instead of  separate indicators  SIF will collapse all indicators into a single composite indicator called School Status Index (SSI)

SIF will organize 24 indicators under 4 Domains and give relative weight to each indicator.

Scene 12

Cumulative Score School Performance 0-20 Unsatisfactory 21-40 Weak 41-60 Satisfactory 61-80 Good 81-100 Outstanding

000'ZG
OOZ'G
000'€L
008'oz
oot'0L
009%
spoqos JO nqwnN
%OOL
0/00'
0/ogz
0/009
O/ooz
0/09
spoqos JO %
o es esu
K'0JoeJsnes
pooo
6u!puqsV10
epeJ9 looqos

2. SIF Categorizes schools by their  needs  for improvement

Based on the SSI score calculated for each school, the SIF will enable  categorization of schools in different performance categories

Each level of DEA will know the  number of schools under their span that lie in each category

Scene 13

3. SIF will provide feedback to schools for self-appraisal. By highlighting the domains that need improvement, SIF will provide direct feedback to the schools.  Head teacher of each school will know exactly  which aspects of school performance need more attention.

4. SIF will generate actions aimed at improving specific aspects of school for all levels of DEA. SIF will identify actions to be taken  ( and by whom )  to improve each domain of school performance. SIF will also track the completion of the identified actions  SIF will help define direction of school improvement by directing the system  to lift schools from the lower bands to the higher bands of school performance.

Scene 14

Pilot in 6 districts from  November 2019 – January 2020  Khushab Jehlum Lodhran Rajanpur Chiniot Pakpattan

MEAs and AEOs will visits all primary schools in these districts between Nov-Jan

MEAs will plug in all the data in the MEA Apps AEOs will plug in all data in the Classroom Observation Tool & the AEO SIS

Rajanpur Khushab Lodhran Jhelum Chiniot Pakpattan

Scene 15

New indicators on which AEOs will collect data Student cleanliness  Teaching aid availability  Teacher CPD participation Teaching practice score  Classroom with adequate visibility Availability of the School Based Improvement Plan (SBIP)

New indicators on which MEAs will collect data   Availability of non-teaching staff Security & safety arrangements Availability of playground/play area Average cleanliness of school facilities

Refer to the SIF Manual for rubrics & SOPs of  collection of data on these indicators

MEAs and AEOs in the pilot districts will collect data on 10 new indicators by visiting all primary schools between Nov 2019 – Jan 2020

Data on following new indicators is to be collected by the MEAs/AEOs.

School Improvement Framework

Page 1 (0s)

Page 2 (8s)

Page 3 (25s)

Page 4 (47s)

Page 5 (1m 53s)

Page 6 (2m 27s)

Page 7 (2m 51s)

Page 8 (3m 15s)

Page 9 (3m 41s)

Page 10 (4m 4s)

Page 11 (4m 39s)

Page 12 (5m 3s)

Page 13 (5m 32s)

Page 14 (6m 8s)

Page 15 (6m 29s)